Can you explain me why do have made renderings tests with this cards? You could have put there an Intel crap and the results would be the same. That counted for something. Power Consumption Page 9: We fired up as many professional-class tests as we could get our hands on to find out. Did I even have room on my desk for such a massive amalgamation of desktop real estate? Eyefinity across three displays remains an impressive sight for anyone used to gaming on just one screen.
|Date Added:||20 July 2008|
|File Size:||44.38 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Adobe CS5 Suite Page 6: Since then, updates have been made, purportedly improving performance.
ATI FirePro V9800 runs out of ideas, shoots up with 4GB of GDDR5 and six mini DisplayPorts
The good news is that DisplayPort 1. As AMD talked about gaming on multiple displays, however, all I could think about was the four-monitor setup I had at home.
Power Consumption Page 9: Test Setup And Benchmarks Page 4: But the six-monitor stuff fell flat —an unfortunate consequence of the fat bezels nearly all LCDs continue to fieepro. What a big mistake in testing with cpu based methods! I certainly had enough software open all day long to use six screens. This is where these cards can make the difference. Can you explain me why do have made renderings tests with this cards?
Subscribe to our newsletter.
FirePro 3D V9800
That firpro for something. And two of those chips could be used together in CrossFire to realistically make x viable. Would adding two screens help improve productivity?
The right question is how these cards manage with the frame rate in 4 views with thousands of objects an billions of polygons. You could have put there an Intel crap and the results would be the same. All of the sudden, we had this GPU that was powerful enough to drive an array of monitors at x, no sweat.
We run it through a battery of SPECapc and real-world performance tests, then compare it to Quadro I have visited the article times to check the new answers and all of them are spam spam spam No offense, but next time give the testing review to someone who actually have some experience in 3D, because first of all some things are making a conflict with preview and well informed articles about pro cards and second if you work with 3D you know what you are wanting for these cards and what they promise to do!
Did I even have room on my desk for such a massive amalgamation of desktop real estate? Eyefinity across three displays remains an impressive sight for anyone used to gaming on just one screen.
AMD FirePro V 4 GB: Eyefinity Meets Professional Graphics
We fired up as many professional-class tests as we could get our hands on to find out. What the hell is going on with all this spam? AMD knows that its new FirePro V is only going to appeal to a very narrow sliver of the professional market.
For those who can use the FirePro V, though, this board is the first of its kind, and it might just enable usage models and configurations that simply were not possible previously.
The Latest On Tom’s Hardware. Test Setup And Benchmarks.
I work in Vue a lot and when the scene starts to count billions of polygons my poor is getting down to it’s knees, when I try to move something on the scene, or move the camera. Only in specific CUDA enabled renderers we can see the gpu to get in final render progress and only nvidia ones.
Again no offense, just pointing out the obvious. This is where you have to test these cards not in cpu based final renderings. Meet The FirePro V Six or seven Skype windows.